LIVE
...

Follow us on

Throwbacks

The reason Roger Federer’s maiden Australian Open title was ‘totally different’ to winning Wimbledon

Add as preferred source on Google

On February 1 2004, Roger Federer won his first Australian Open title.

The Swiss Maestro, who went on to win 20 Grand Slams during his career, defeated Marat Safin 7–6, 6–4, 6–2 in the final.

Roger Federer of Switzerland greets fans as he holds the trophy for winning the Australian Open Grand Slam against Marat Safin of Russia during day fourteen of the Australian Open.
Photo by Clive Brunskill/Getty Images

The title increased Federer’s major total to two after his maiden triumph at the 2003 Wimbledon Championships.

At that tournament, Federer defeated Mark Philippoussis 7-6, 6-2, 7-6 in front of the Centre Court crowd at SW19. He would go on to win a further seven Wimbledon titles, his last being in 2017.

Federer, who also won six Australian Open titles, captured his final title in Melbourne in 2018.

Roger Federer said winning the Australian Open for the first time was ‘totally different’ to winning Wimbledon as he was now used to the feeling

After winning his maiden title in Australia, Federer was asked to compare how he felt in that moment to his feelings after winning Wimbledon in 2003.

Roger Federer poses with the Wimbledon trophy in 2003.
Photo by Bongarts/Getty Images

Federer, who went on to form a legendary rivalry with Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal, said the feelings were ‘totally different,’ as winning Wimbledon was a dream and a ‘relief.’

The Swiss legend said: “Totally different really because, like I’ve always said, that Wimbledon victory for me was such a dream and such a relief. I cannot really describe what I felt right then, right there.

“But now I kind of know how it feels. It’s still really nice. It just gets me all emotional inside.

“Yeah, it’s just unbelievable. You know, you come here, you prepare, you leave after three weeks basically, and you’re finally the winner after such a long time. It just really feels good.”

Who will win the 2026 men’s Australian Open?

Marat Safin spoke about Federer’s comparisons to Pete Sampras

Safin, a winner of two Grand Slam titles, defeated Andre Agassi and Andy Roddick on his way to the 2004 Australian Open final.

Therefore, he can count himself rather unfortunate that he was pitted against yet another all-time great in the final.

After losing to Federer, Safin was asked whether the Swiss star could be compared to Pete Sampras.

Safin replied: “No. It’s a little bit different story. Yeah, they have some kind of same things. But I think Federer, he has better — he a little bit — I don’t want to take anything from Pete.

“I mean, mentally, he was the strongest player on the tour. He has the biggest serve in the world. He has an unbelievable forehand and very good hands in the volley. But sometimes he was missing a little bit the backhand.

Marat Safin of Russia poses with Roger Federer of Switzerland after the Mens Singles Final during day fourteen of the Australian Open Grand Slam at Melbourne Park February 1, 2004 in Melbourne, Australia.
Photo by Clive Brunskill/Getty Images

“So Roger, he has — he has everything and a backhand. Probably he doesn’t have enough volley like Pete Sampras. But he is really good. I mean, he can volley. It’s a little bit different story.

“But Pete, as you can see, he won 14 Grand Slams. And he has a really good — he was really, really tough.”

At the time of Safin’s comments, Sampras held the record for the most Grand Slam singles titles won by a man in the history of tennis.

Sampras retired from his playing career in 2003 after winning 64 ATP Tour titles.