LIVE
...

Follow us on

Opinion

Carlos Alcaraz’s recent comments have been proven entirely correct after the latest round of exhibition matches

Add as preferred source on Google

Carlos Alcaraz has come under fire this year following his consistent criticism of the ATP Tour schedule.

The Spaniard, like Iga Swiatek, has frequently commented on the intensity of the tennis schedule, arguing that players do not have enough time to recover between tournaments.

However, Alcaraz has been subject to criticism due to his regular participation in exhibition events during the off-season.

Critics point out that Alcaraz’s complaints may fall on deaf ears if he continues to compete during the off-season.

What do you think about Carlos Alcaraz’s decision to play in exhibition events?

“People are giving Carlos a hard time for him pulling out of the Davis Cup but still playing this [exhibition vs Fonseca]. I think that is insane.

“There is a vast difference between a competitive match and an exhibition, health-wise.”

Steve Johnson on the ‘Nothing Major’ podcast.

In October, Alcaraz responded to these criticisms, claiming players are misunderstood with regard to their participation in exhibition events.

After competing in his latest exhibition event in America, it seems Alcaraz was absolutely correct.

Carlos Alcaraz was right when he said that off-season exhibitions are different to official tournaments

The Spaniard has recently competed in two exhibition events. On December 7, he contested a match against Frances Tiafoe before pairing with Amanda Anisimova in a doubles match against Tiafoe and Jessica Pegula

A day later, Alcaraz defeated Joao Fonseca at the Miami Invitational.

These matches, as exhibitions should be, were events for the benefit of the crowds who attended, rather than for the players.

Carlos Alcaraz of Spain returns a shot through his legs during his singles match at the Miami Invitational at loanDepot Park in Miami, Florida, on December 8, 2025.
Photo by Mauricio Paiz/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Simply put, the matches lacked the intensity to cause significant physical or mental hindrance to the players.

Alcaraz argued this point while speaking at the Six Kings Slam in October.

He said: “A lot of players are talking about the calendar, how tight it is with a lot of tournaments, tournaments of two weeks, and then making excuses with exhibitions.

“It’s a different format, different situation playing exhibitions than the official tournaments, 15, 16 days in row, having such a high focus and demanding physically.

“We’re just having fun for one or two days and playing some tennis, and that’s great, and why we choose the exhibitions.

If you were in charge of tennis, what is the first rule you would change?

Mystery player (top left) in a circle overlay and an overview of Court One
Credit: KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP via Getty Images

“I understand [the criticism], but sometimes people don’t understand us, our opinions. It’s not really demanding mentally [compared with] when we’re having such long events like two weeks or two and a half weeks.”

Steve Johnson, the former world number 21, supported Alcaraz earlier this month, saying there is a ‘vast difference between a competitive match and an exhibition.’

Carlos Alcaraz’s willingness to play in exhibitions should be praised

Carlos Alcaraz is not only a competitive tennis player but an entertainer.

His participation in exhibition events should be praised – few players are so willing – or have the capability – to put on a show for the fans.

Alcaraz is set to play one more exhibition event before the first major of 2026. The Spaniard and Jannik Sinner are set to play an exhibition match on January 10 in Seoul, South Korea.

The match will take place eight days before the start of the 2026 Australian Open.